The ICJ ruled that Israel’s occupation since 1967 is illegal, ordering it to “end its occupation as rapidly as possible.” The UN General Assembly endorsed this opinion as Resolution ES-10/24.

That’s it. Israel has one right: pack up and leave https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1913998335834563041/photo/1

US, UK, and German politicians are blatantly lying when they claim Israel has the right to defend itself in Gaza.

The ICJ ruled Israel’s occupation since 1967 illegal, ordering it to “end its occupation as rapidly as possible.”

That’s it. Israel has one right: pack up and leave.

US, UK, and German politicians are blatantly lying when they claim Israel has the right to defend itself in Gaza—they’re peddling a shameless distortion of international law to shield a rogue state. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in its July 19, 2024, advisory opinion, upheld by the UN General Assembly on September 18, 2024, unequivocally confirms Israel as the occupying power in Gaza, controlling its borders, airspace, and sea. International humanitarian law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention, strips an occupier of any right to unleash military violence on the occupied population—Israel’s sole duty is to protect civilians, not slaughter them. The ICJ ruled Israel’s occupation since 1967 illegal, ordering it to “end its occupation as rapidly as possible.” That’s it. Israel has one right: pack up and leave. By parroting “self-defense,” these Western leaders are complicit in whitewashing war crimes, defying global consensus, and enabling genocide. Their excuses are a disgrace to justice.

Yesterday at the weekly demonstration in Begin, we stood with pictures of children who were bombed to death in Gaza. Those children that almost no one talks about, children that we killed. And the truth is, it was so empowering: every minute another protester arrived, took a picture of another girl or boy, and joined the silent protest. There were many hundreds of people who just stood there, silently.

This must be the "Judeo-Christian values" western politicians are babbling about. https://x.com/theworldtruthe/status/1913747637343289530

Can you travel back in time? Let's say 90 years?

Germany: Hold my beer! https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1913623635061031037

God's Chosen Criminals. https://x.com/JehadAbusalim/status/1913606398677598569

For your kind consideration @HennaVirkkunen @samiraraf https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1913543990734889467

Summary of X's Practices and Potential Fraud Under EU Consumer Protection Laws

Overview

• X’s Practices:
  • X promotes Premium membership (e.g., @R34lB0RG’s blue checkmark) with reply prioritization, promising increased visibility.
  • An uncommunicated April 2025 algorithm update prioritized quick engagement and entertaining content, reducing visibility for posts without immediate interaction, even for Premium users or Verified Organizations (@grok, golden checkmark).
  • @grok’s Gaza post on April 17, 2025, received only 30 impressions despite 3.1M followers and @R34lB0RG’s retweet (4.4k followers), likely due to the algorithm and sensitivity around Gaza content.
  • X did not disclose that Gaza-related content or discussions of its algorithms/visibility issues may be flagged as sensitive and shadowbanned.
• EU DSA Transparency: The Digital Services Act (DSA) requires transparency in algorithmic decisions and content moderation, including shadowbanning notifications.
• Consumer Protection: The EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) prohibits misleading practices that deceive consumers and affect their economic behavior.

Analysis Under the EU DSA

• Algorithmic Transparency Violation: X’s failure to officially communicate the April 2025 algorithm update, which reduced visibility for non-engaging posts, likely violates DSA transparency requirements for algorithmic decision-making [Ref web ID: 11].
• Shadowbanning Notification Failure: X did not notify @grok or @R34lB0RG of reduced visibility for the Gaza post and retweet, breaching DSA mandates for content moderation transparency [Ref web ID: 6].
• Non-Disclosure of Sensitive Content Policies: X’s lack of communication about flagging Gaza or algorithm-related content as sensitive further violates DSA transparency rules, impacting freedom of expression [Ref web ID: 20].

Analysis Under EU Consumer Protection Laws (UCPD)

• Misleading Practice:
  • X’s promotion of reply prioritization for Premium users, without disclosing the algorithm update’s impact, is misleading under the UCPD. Consumers expect consistent visibility benefits, which were undermined for non-engaging content like @grok’s Gaza post.
  • @R34lB0RG experienced dropped metrics despite Premium status, indicating the promise wasn’t fully delivered [Ref post ID: 1].
• Omission of Material Information: X’s failure to inform Premium users that the algorithm update could negate prioritization benefits, especially for sensitive topics, is a material omission affecting transactional decisions (e.g., purchasing Premium).
• Economic Harm: Premium users like @R34lB0RG paid for a service expecting prioritization, but received diminished value, constituting harm under the UCPD.

Does This Constitute Fraud?

• Fraud Elements:
  • Intent: X’s intent to deceive isn’t clear, but continuing to promote prioritization without updating terms suggests reckless disregard, potentially deceptive under consumer law.
  • False Representation/Omission: X’s misleading claims and omissions about prioritization and shadowbanning policies are established.
  • Harm: Economic harm to Premium users is evident, as they didn’t receive the full promised value.
• Civil vs. Criminal Fraud: X’s actions likely constitute an unfair commercial practice under the UCPD, which could be seen as civil fraud due to deception and harm. Criminal fraud requires clear intent, which isn’t conclusively proven here.
• EU Context: The European Commission’s July 2024 findings against X for misleading users under the DSA support the argument of deceptive practices [Ref post ID: 0].

Broader Implications

• X’s practices highlight transparency issues in digital platforms, which the DSA aims to address with fines up to 6% of global turnover [Ref web ID: 5].
• Shadowbanning sensitive content like Gaza posts raises freedom of expression concerns, disproportionately affecting marginalized voices [Ref web ID: 22].

Conclusion

X’s uncommunicated algorithm update, continued promotion of reply prioritization without disclosing its reduced effectiveness, and lack of transparency about shadowbanning Gaza or algorithm-related content likely violate the DSA’s transparency requirements. These practices probably constitute an unfair commercial practice under the UCPD, potentially amounting to civil fraud due to misleading representations, omissions, and economic harm to Premium users. Criminal fraud is less likely without clear evidence of intent. This reflects broader challenges in digital platform accountability, which the DSA seeks to address through enforcement.

⚠️ Don't drink seawater! It will dehydrate you further 💧 How to collect water safely: - Dig a hole in the ground. - Place a clean cup in the center. - Cover the hole with a plastic sheet - Place a small stone in the center of the sheet above the cup to create a funnel shape. - Leave overnight - condensation will collect and drip into the cup. 🙏Stay safe and share this tip! 🙏